Free Shipping on Orders Over $500 · 10-Year Warranty · Code SOLAR10

person
HJT vs TOPCon Solar Panels: Which Technology Wins for Your Rooftop?

HJT vs TOPCon Solar Panels: Which Technology Wins for Your Rooftop?

HJT vs TOPCon solar panel technology comparison

Understanding the Two Leading High-Efficiency Solar Technologies

The solar industry is in the middle of a technology transition. While PERC panels dominated the last decade, two next-generation technologies are now battling for supremacy: HJT (Heterojunction with Intrinsic Thin-layer) and TOPCon (Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact).

Both promise higher efficiency than PERC. Both are being adopted by major manufacturers. But they differ fundamentally in architecture, manufacturing complexity, real-world performance, and total cost of ownership.

How They Work

HJT - AGAIC BSM715

HJT combines crystalline silicon with thin-film amorphous silicon layers. AGAIC POWER BSM715 panels achieve 23.5% module efficiency with a temperature coefficient of just -0.26%/°C. The simpler manufacturing process (4 main steps) also means lower carbon footprint (<400 kgCO2/kW).

TOPCon

TOPCon uses an ultra-thin tunnel oxide layer for rear-side passivation. Most TOPCon cells retain the front-side emitter from PERC designs, making the upgrade path from existing factories easier. Efficiency reaches 22-23%.

Key Comparison

Parameter HJT (BSM715) TOPCon
Efficiency 22.5-23.5% 22.0-23.0%
Temp Coefficient -0.26%/°C -0.30%/°C
Bifaciality 90-95% 80-85%
Carbon Footprint <400 kgCO2/kW ~500 kgCO2/kW
25-Year Degradation ~13% ~15%

Which to Choose?

Choose HJT if: hot climate, limited roof space, ground-mount bifacial, carbon-sensitive procurement.

Choose TOPCon if: upfront cost is primary constraint, moderate climate, flush roof mount.

AGAIC POWER Verdict

At AGAIC POWER, we invested in HJT because the physics favors it: fewer steps, lower temperature sensitivity, higher bifaciality, inherently lower degradation. Browse our BSM715 HJT solar panel series →

Fullscreen view